🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how little it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.