🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose it with a dejected Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, appearing like he just missed a sitter. Do not worry finding a real picture of him missing; context is the enemy. Now, add statistics in a big, comical font. Don't forget some emoticons. Post it across all platforms.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count includes strikes in the premier European competition while his counterpart does not compete in Europe? Certainly not. And will you highlight that several of Højlund's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and creates many more scoring opportunities. If you run online for a large outlet, pure engagement is what pays the bills, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the cycle of content spins. The next job is to sift through a lengthy interview with the legendary goalkeeper and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". Just before, where Schmeichel qualifies his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. No one wants that. Simply ensure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. The audience will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my preferred times to observe football. Leaves fall, winds shift, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. The stars of the season ahead are staking their claims. The transfer window is closed. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the best player in the league right now? We need an answer now.

Sesko as The Prime Example

In many ways, Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this context, a player caught between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, to let layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to generate permanent verdicts, a constant stream of takes and jokes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a puzzle that can not truly be solved.

I do not propose to offer a in-depth analysis of Sesko's stint at United so far. He has started on four occasions in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, found the net twice, and had a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? And do I propose to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be deemed successful this season (Neville), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a big, fast racing car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: given the license to attack but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most pitiless gap between the patience and space he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

There was a case of this during the international break, when a viral infographic conveniently stated that Sesko had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the recent market by a survey of football representatives. Naturally, the media are by no means alone in this. Team social media, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of fake followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically aligned along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards controversy.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to ourselves? Are we aware, on some level, what this endless stream of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of being a player in the center of it all, knowing on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about players is now essentially content, product, public property to be repackaged and exchanged.

And yes, partly this is because United are United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must always be generating the strong emotions. However, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most visibly and cruelly observed at this season, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. All summer long we have been coveting players, praising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, many of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Is it time to be concerned about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

A Wider Issue

It feels appropriate that Sesko faces Liverpool on Sunday: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the Premier League and somehow in their own state of perceived turmoil, like filing a missing person’s report on a person who went to the store half an hour ago. Too open. Their star finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we view it, an entire sport repivoted around talking points and reaction, something that happens in the backdrop while we scroll through our devices, incapable to disconnect from the saline drip of opinions and more takes. It may be this player bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, we're all losing a part of the experience here.