🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."