🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their future often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government prevented the export of the belugas to China, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are held threatened to euthanize them unless the government covers the upkeep of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker observed personally.

Burgess spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a position that required building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their characters. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with different temperaments.

“Eve chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The facility did not operate to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far better medical attention and 24/7 attention than any person in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of Eos, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the death were shared to the media and she was let go soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs demands for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a bid to send the whales to China.

“Granting the request would have meant a continued life in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements indicate a more general misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas born in captivity.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a solution, proposals have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the idea of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the coming months.

An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|